Weed v. Lermond

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Weed v. Lermond

33 Me. 492

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedJuly 1, 1851

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Me. 492 (Weed v. Lermond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weed v. Lermond, 33 Me. 492 (Me. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

Although it is proper for an administrator to charge himself for the amount at which debts, due to the intestate, were appraised, such charge is not conclusive of his liability for that amount.

An administrator is not authorized to take such debts to his own use at the appraisal, nor bound to account for them at the appraisal. His responsibility is that of reasonable diligence in the collection of them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Although it is proper for an administrator to charge himself for the amount at which debts, due to the intestate, were appraised, such charge is not conclusive of his liability for that amount.

An administrator is not authorized to take such debts to his own use at the appraisal, nor bound to account for them at the appraisal. His responsibility is that of reasonable diligence in the collection of them.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Me. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weed-v-lermond-me-1851.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack