Weed v. Halladay
1 How. Pr. 73
This text of 1 How. Pr. 73 (Weed v. Halladay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weed v. Halladay, 1 How. Pr. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Upon these papers, we must intend that twenty-.two of the plaintiff’s witnesses are deemed to be necessary to prove the defendant’s hand writing, a fact which can as well be heard by witnesses residing in Niagara, as those who reside in New York (5 Hill, 509, Benedict vs. Hibbard). The motion must be granted.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weed-v-halladay-nysupct-1845.