Weed v. Gay

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Weed v. Gay

160 F. 695, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5079

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

DecidedMay 4, 1908

DocketNo. 1,259

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 160 F. 695 (Weed v. Gay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weed v. Gay, 160 F. 695, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5079 (circtdct 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

I think that paragraph 8 of the bill may fairly be construed as alleging that the defendants are selling devices which infringe the patent, and are copying complainant’s circulars about the patented device for an unfair purpose.

The proofs must conform, to such contruction, and to make assurance doubly sure, let the words “under said letters patent” be placed as an ending to paragraph 8. This may be done without costs to either party.

The demurrer being disposed of let the pleadings go forward in the regular way.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

I think that paragraph 8 of the bill may fairly be construed as alleging that the defendants are selling devices which infringe the patent, and are copying complainant’s circulars about the patented device for an unfair purpose.

The proofs must conform, to such contruction, and to make assurance doubly sure, let the words “under said letters patent” be placed as an ending to paragraph 8. This may be done without costs to either party.

The demurrer being disposed of let the pleadings go forward in the regular way.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 F. 695, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weed-v-gay-circtdct-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack