Weed v. Brazill
192 A.D. 71, 182 N.Y.S. 355, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 1920·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
It follows from the reasoning in Brazill v. Weed (192 App. Div. 66) that this order was properly issued, and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Dowling, Laughlin and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weed v. Brazill, 192 A.D. 71, 182 N.Y.S. 355, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
192 A.D. 71 (Weed v. Brazill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leonard v. Tatum & Dalton Transfer Co.
12 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Hot Blast Coal Co. v. Williax
10 Tenn. App. 226 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1929)
Bosco v. Boston Store
229 Ill. App. 564 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)