Weed v. Brazill
192 A.D. 71, 182 N.Y.S. 355, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 192 A.D. 71 (Weed v. Brazill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weed v. Brazill, 192 A.D. 71, 182 N.Y.S. 355, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
It follows from the reasoning in Brazill v. Weed (192 App. Div. 66) that this order was properly issued, and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Dowling, Laughlin and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leonard v. Tatum & Dalton Transfer Co.
12 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Hot Blast Coal Co. v. Williax
10 Tenn. App. 226 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1929)
Bosco v. Boston Store
229 Ill. App. 564 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
192 A.D. 71, 182 N.Y.S. 355, 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weed-v-brazill-nyappdiv-1920.