Weed v. Andes Co-operative Dairy Co.
250 A.D. 876, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9527
Opinion
In an action for malicious prosecution, order granting defendents’ motion for summary judgment and denying the plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to serve a proposed amended complaint, and the judgments for defendants entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (249 N. Y. 296) and Graham v. Buffalo General Laundries Corp. (261 id. 165). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weed v. Andes Co-operative Dairy Co., 250 A.D. 876, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
250 A.D. 876 (Weed v. Andes Co-operative Dairy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
164 N.E. 104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)