Weech v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weech v. State

309 So. 2d 246, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14385

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 1975·No. No. 73-1080·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudged to be in indirect criminal contempt of the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, for her failure to respond to an investigative subpoena served upon her by the office of the State Attorney.

The record discloses that after appellant was served with an order to show cause as provided in subsection (a)(1) of Rule 3.-840, R.Cr.P., the court failed to follow the procedure set forth in the remainder of said rule. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.840, R.Cr.P.

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudged to be in indirect criminal contempt of the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida, for her failure to respond to an investigative subpoena served upon her by the office of the State Attorney.

The record discloses that after appellant was served with an order to show cause as provided in subsection (a)(1) of Rule 3.-840, R.Cr.P., the court failed to follow the procedure set forth in the remainder of said rule. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3.840, R.Cr.P.

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.

Weech v. State, 309 So. 2d 246, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14385 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

309 So. 2d 246 (Weech v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related