Wedlow v. State
This text of 814 S.W.2d 750 (Wedlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[751]*751OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted for aggravated robbery and burglary of a habitation in a single trial. The Court of Appeals reversed the convictions, holding the trial court erred by denying appellant’s motion for severance. Wedlow v. State, 807 S.W.2d 847 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991).
In its petition, the State raises two grounds for review questioning the appellate court’s application of this Court’s holding in Sodipo v. State, 815 S.W.2d 551 (Tex.Cr.App.1990). As is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse the State’s petition for discretionary review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
814 S.W.2d 750, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wedlow-v-state-texcrimapp-1991.