Wedington v. Veterans Administration

Fourth Circuit

Wedington v. Veterans Administration

600 F. App'x 142

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 2015

DocketNo. 15-6245

StatusPublished

This text of 600 F. App'x 142 (Wedington v. Veterans Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wedington v. Veterans Administration, 600 F. App'x 142 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wedington’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Wedington has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wedington’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Wedington has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 F. App'x 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wedington-v-veterans-administration-ca4-2015.