Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government

620 F. App'x 194
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2015·No. No. 15-7226·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Scott Wedington appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as frivolous. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Wedington’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Wedington has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Wed-ington’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government, 620 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2015).

620 F. App'x 194 (Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.