Wedington v. Unnamed Deputy U.S. Marshal
This text of 669 F. App'x 652 (Wedington v. Unnamed Deputy U.S. Marshal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Calvin Scott Wedington appeals from the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) his civil action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). On appeal, Wedington fails to explain how the district court erred in its dismissal decision. Accordingly, Wedington has waived appellate review of the court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). We thus grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wedington-v-unnamed-deputy-us-marshal-ca4-2016.