Wedi Corp. v. Wright

Opinion

1 2

3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 WEDI CORP., Plaintiff, 8 v. C15-671 TSZ 9 BRIAN WRIGHT; HYDRO-BLOK MINUTE ORDER 10 USA LLC; and HYDROBLOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., 11 Defendants. 12 SOUND PRODUCT SALES L.L.C., 13 Counterclaimant, 14 v. 15 WEDI CORP., 16 Counter-Defendant.

17 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 18 (1) The motion for attorney’s fees brought by Brian Wright, Hydro-Blok USA, 19 LLC, Hydroblok International Ltd., and Sound Product Sales L.L.C. (collectively, “Wright”), docket no. 298, is DENIED in part, DEFERRED in part, and RENOTED as 20 follows: 21 (a) With regard to attorney’s fees sought under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act as prevailing defendants, Wright’s motion is DENIED. See Sato v. 22 Century 21 Ocean Shores Real Estate, 101 Wn.2d 599, 603, 681 P.2d 242 (1984). 1 (b) With regard to attorney’s fees sought under the Lanham Act, the motion is DEFERRED and RENOTED, in light of the intervening holidays, to 2 January 17, 2020. Any response and any reply shall be due in accordance with Local Civil Rule 7(d)(3). 3 (2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 4 record. Dated this 23rd day of December, 2019. 5 6 William M. McCool Clerk 7 s/Karen Dews 8 Deputy Clerk 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22