Wedding v. Commonwealth

468 S.W.2d 273, 1971 Ky. LEXIS 325
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 11, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 468 S.W.2d 273 (Wedding v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wedding v. Commonwealth, 468 S.W.2d 273, 1971 Ky. LEXIS 325 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

STEINFELD, Judge.

Appellant, Carl James Wedding, who is a prisoner in the state penitentiary at Eddy-ville, Kentucky, moved the Webster Circuit Court to vacate a judgment by which he was sentenced to life imprisonment for the crime of murder. Relief was sought under the post-conviction remedy authorized by RCr 11.42. The petition was denied, hence this appeal. We affirm.

In 1949 Wedding pleaded guilty to the charge. His motion to vacate was not made until June 13, 1970. He alleged only that he * * * was denied effective assistance of counsel in that he received belated appointment and * * * petitioner was coerced into a guilty plea (that) * * * counsel for the defendant was appointed too late to prepare a defense and petitioner was coerced into a guilty plea as a result.” In Copeland v. Commonwealth, Ky., 397 S.W.2d 59 (1965), we declared that petitioner’s complaint of inadequacy of counsel would not be heard when he delayed for 20 years' in raising that issue. We said in McKinney v. Commonwealth, Ky., 445 S.W.2d 874 (1969), that the petitioner who had waited 13 years to claim he was coerced into entering a plea of guilty had not met the “ * * * heavy burden of proof with respect to the facts on which the relief must rest.” Here Wedding alleges no basis for his conclusory statement.

We hold that the meager allegations he made were insufficient to require the circuit court to grant an evidentiary hearing. See Burton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 394 S.W.2d 933 (1965); Harrison v. Commonwealth, Ky., 436 S.W.2d 259 (1969); Brooks v. Commonwealth, Ky., 447 S.W.2d 614 (1969); United States v. Edwards (DCDC) 152 F.Supp. 179 (1957), affirmed Edwards v. United States, 103 U.S.App. D.C. 152, 256 F.2d 707 (1958), cert. den. 358 U.S. 847, 79 S.Ct. 74, 3 L.Ed.2d 82; Harris v. Commonwealth, Ky., 456 S.W.2d 690 (1970).

Finding no error judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brian Edmonds v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2021
Michael Ray Dungan v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2021
Erik Tucker v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 S.W.2d 273, 1971 Ky. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wedding-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1971.