Wedden v. Wentz
571 So. 2d 24, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5038, 1990 WL 96233
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 1990·No. No. 89-03039·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm the jury verdict and resulting judgment of no actionable negligence on the part of the appellee/defendant below. A concurring cause instruction is not required where the only issue on the question of liability is the comparative negligence of the plaintiff and defendant, and no extraneous concurring cause is either alleged or proved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wedden v. Wentz, 571 So. 2d 24, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5038, 1990 WL 96233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
571 So. 2d 24 (Wedden v. Wentz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
La Petite Academy v. Kamerzel
751 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Parker v. Hoppock
695 So. 2d 424 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
John Christen Corp. v. Maita
571 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)