Weckline v. Musgrave

227 A.D. 796

Opinion

Order denying motion to change place of trial from Queens county to Greene county reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The number of material witnesses necessary to be called upon either side being substantially the same, in the absence of some special reason for retaining the place of trial in the county of plaintiff’s residence, it should be changed to the county where the cause of action arose. (Fluckiger v. Haber, 144 App. Div. 65, Rose v. Town of Richmond, 214 App. Div. 142.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weckline v. Musgrave, 227 A.D. 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 796 (Weckline v. Musgrave) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fluckiger v. Haber
144 A.D. 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Rose v. Town of Richmond
214 A.D. 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)