Weck v. Weck
464 So. 2d 619, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1985·No. No. 84-2092·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. An order striking defenses entered pursuant to rule 1.380(b)(2)(C), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, is an appropriate response by the court to “intentional delay and abuse of the system” by willful refusal to comply with orders pertaining to discovery, Georges v. Insurance Technicians, Inc., 448 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), which will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weck v. Weck, 464 So. 2d 619, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
464 So. 2d 619 (Weck v. Weck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gold, Vann & White, PA v. DeBERRY EX REL. DeBERRY
639 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Whiteside v. Whiteside
468 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)