Weck v. Weck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Weck v. Weck

464 So. 2d 619, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2092

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 464 So. 2d 619 (Weck v. Weck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weck v. Weck, 464 So. 2d 619, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. An order striking defenses entered pursuant to rule 1.380(b)(2)(C), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, is an appropriate response by the court to “intentional delay and abuse of the system” by willful refusal to comply with orders pertaining to discovery, Georges v. Insurance Technicians, Inc., 448 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), which will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983).

HERSEY, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. An order striking defenses entered pursuant to rule 1.380(b)(2)(C), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, is an appropriate response by the court to “intentional delay and abuse of the system” by willful refusal to comply with orders pertaining to discovery, Georges v. Insurance Technicians, Inc., 448 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), which will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983).

HERSEY, WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 So. 2d 619, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weck-v-weck-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack