Wechsler v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

201 A.D.2d 413, 607 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1512

This text of 201 A.D.2d 413 (Wechsler v. United Services Automobile Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wechsler v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 201 A.D.2d 413, 607 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered February 18, 1993, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that the plain language of the homeowner policy exclusion for theft loss for “that part of the residence premises rented by an insured to other than an insured” was unambiguous in excluding from coverage property stolen when the entire premises was rented (see, Breed v Insurance Co., 46 NY2d 351, 355). Concur — Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Breed v. Insurance Co. of North America
385 N.E.2d 1280 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 413, 607 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wechsler-v-united-services-automobile-assn-nyappdiv-1994.