Wechsler v. Beall & Associates Roofing Corp.
This text of 442 So. 2d 1104 (Wechsler v. Beall & Associates Roofing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant the appellees’ motion for rehearing and withdraw our opinion filed November 8, 1983, and substitute the following:
We affirm the judgment for Kent Insurance Company which determined that Kent’s policy of insurance issued to Beall & Associates Roofing Corporation excluded coverage for the replacement and repair of appellant’s roof. Although such policy of insurance did not exclude coverage for other property damage caused by Beall’s negligence, for example, damages to the walls and interior of appellant’s home, furnishings and objects therein, see La Marche v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co., 390 So.2d 325 (Fla.1980), the appellant withdrew from the jury’s consideration his claim for such damages.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 So. 2d 1104, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wechsler-v-beall-associates-roofing-corp-fladistctapp-1983.