Wechsler v. Beall & Associates Roofing Corp.

442 So. 2d 1104, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25370
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 1983·No. No. 82-2635·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellees’ motion for rehearing and withdraw our opinion filed November 8, 1983, and substitute the following:

We affirm the judgment for Kent Insurance Company which determined that Kent’s policy of insurance issued to Beall & Associates Roofing Corporation excluded coverage for the replacement and repair of appellant’s roof. Although such policy of insurance did not exclude coverage for other property damage caused by Beall’s negligence, for example, damages to the walls and interior of appellant’s home, furnishings and objects therein, see La Marche v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co., 390 So.2d 325 (Fla.1980), the appellant withdrew from the jury’s consideration his claim for such damages.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wechsler v. Beall & Associates Roofing Corp., 442 So. 2d 1104, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25370 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

442 So. 2d 1104 (Wechsler v. Beall & Associates Roofing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thornton v. State
442 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)