Webster v. Wetzel
This text of 262 A.D.2d 1038 (Webster v. Wetzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs.' Memorandum: Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries he sustained when the rear gate of a dump truck gave way and released 10 tons of stone onto him. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6). We reject plaintiffs contention that the accident involved an elevation-related hazard covered by Labor Law § 240 (1) (see, Tillman v Triou’s Custom Homes, 253 AD2d 254; Phelan v State of New York, 238 AD2d 882, lv denied 90 NY2d 812; Flihan v Cornell Univ., 237 AD2d 921; cf., Orr v Christa Constr., 206 AD2d 881). We also reject plaintiffs contention that 12 NYCRR 23-1.5 (c) is specific enough to support the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim (see, Ozzimo v H.E.S., Inc., 249 AD2d 912; Dann v City of Syracuse, 231 AD2d 855; Williams v White Haven Mem. Park, 227 AD2d 923; contra, Gonzalez v United Parcel Serv., 249 AD2d 210; McCormack v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 233 AD2d 203). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D.2d 1038, 691 N.Y.S.2d 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-wetzel-nyappdiv-1999.