Webster v. State

869 S.W.2d 921, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1994 WL 35527
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 8, 1994
DocketNo. 63990
StatusPublished

This text of 869 S.W.2d 921 (Webster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webster v. State, 869 S.W.2d 921, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1994 WL 35527 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after remand for an evidentiary hearing, 837 S.W.2d 585. We find no clear error. Rule 29.15(j). We further find an opinion in this matter would have no prece-dential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webster v. State
837 S.W.2d 585 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
869 S.W.2d 921, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1994 WL 35527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-state-moctapp-1994.