Webster v. State
869 S.W.2d 921, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1994 WL 35527
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after remand for an evidentiary hearing, 837 S.W.2d 585. We find no clear error. Rule 29.15(j). We further find an opinion in this matter would have no prece-dential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webster v. State, 869 S.W.2d 921, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, 1994 WL 35527 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
869 S.W.2d 921 (Webster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webster v. State
837 S.W.2d 585 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)