Webster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webster v. State

634 So. 2d 1161, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4165, 1994 WL 148169

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 27, 1994

DocketNo. 93-3489

StatusPublished

This text of 634 So. 2d 1161 (Webster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webster v. State, 634 So. 2d 1161, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4165, 1994 WL 148169 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of (1) his conviction of the offense of leaving the scene of an accident with injury; (2) an order directing that he pay restitution; and (3) his sentence for the offense of leaving the scene of an accident with property damage. Because the issues raised regarding the conviction for leaving the scene of an accident with injury and the order directing payment of restitution have not been preserved for review, we affirm as to them, without further discussion. We do, however, reverse appellant’s sentence for the offense of leaving the scene of an accident with property damage, which, the state correctly concedes, exceeds the statutory maximum for that offense. On remand, the trial court is directed to impose punishment for that offense in accordance with section 316.-061(1), Florida Statutes (1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant seeks review of (1) his conviction of the offense of leaving the scene of an accident with injury; (2) an order directing that he pay restitution; and (3) his sentence for the offense of leaving the scene of an accident with property damage. Because the issues raised regarding the conviction for leaving the scene of an accident with injury and the order directing payment of restitution have not been preserved for review, we affirm as to them, without further discussion. We do, however, reverse appellant’s sentence for the offense of leaving the scene of an accident with property damage, which, the state correctly concedes, exceeds the statutory maximum for that offense. On remand, the trial court is directed to impose punishment for that offense in accordance with section 316.-061(1), Florida Statutes (1989).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

634 So. 2d 1161, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4165, 1994 WL 148169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.