Webster v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Webster v. State

667 S.W.2d 955, 282 Ark. 250, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1626

DecidedApril 16, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 667 S.W.2d 955 (Webster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webster v. State, 667 S.W.2d 955, 282 Ark. 250, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1626 (Ark. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Donald Webster, by his attorney, Raymond A. Abramson, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was filed late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Donald Webster, by his attorney, Raymond A. Abramson, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the record was filed late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 S.W.2d 955, 282 Ark. 250, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-state-ark-1984.