Webster v. Roe
150 N.E. 559, 241 N.Y. 570, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652
This text of 150 N.E. 559 (Webster v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Webster v. Roe, 150 N.E. 559, 241 N.Y. 570, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652 (N.Y. 1925).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo and Lehman, JJ., concur on ground that plaintiff under complaint and reply cannot recover on note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goodman v. Olsen
305 So. 2d 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Cusick v. Ifshin
70 Misc. 2d 564 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1972)
Webster v. Roe
126 Misc. 792 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
150 N.E. 559, 241 N.Y. 570, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-roe-ny-1925.