Webster v. Roe
150 N.E. 559, 241 N.Y. 570, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo and Lehman, JJ., concur on ground that plaintiff under complaint and reply cannot recover on note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webster v. Roe, 150 N.E. 559, 241 N.Y. 570, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652 (N.Y. 1925).
150 N.E. 559 (Webster v. Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodman v. Olsen
305 So. 2d 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Cusick v. Ifshin
70 Misc. 2d 564 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1972)
Webster v. Roe
126 Misc. 792 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)