Webster v. Lawley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Webster v. Lawley

28 A.D.2d 810, 281 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.2d 810 (Webster v. Lawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webster v. Lawley, 28 A.D.2d 810, 281 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: The parties in open court stipulated that the Board of Elections certified 470 signatures on the designating petition of petitioner as meeting the requirements of the Election Law, and that the board invalidated 36 signatures appearing on two particular sheets on the ground that the subscribing witness on the two sheets failed to correctly designate the election district in which the witness resided. The designating petition of petitioner is invalid for lack of the 500 signatures required' by law. (See Memorandum in Matter of Maurin v. Allis, 28 A D 2d 810, decided herewith.) (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, declaring designating petitions valid.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: The parties in open court stipulated that the Board of Elections certified 470 signatures on the designating petition of petitioner as meeting the requirements of the Election Law, and that the board invalidated 36 signatures appearing on two particular sheets on the ground that the subscribing witness on the two sheets failed to correctly designate the election district in which the witness resided. The designating petition of petitioner is invalid for lack of the 500 signatures required' by law. (See Memorandum in Matter of Maurin v. Allis, 28 A D 2d 810, decided herewith.) (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, declaring designating petitions valid.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.2d 810, 281 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-lawley-nyappdiv-1967.