Webster v. Jones
43 Fla. 259
Opinion
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error and E. Rigney, as late co-partners under the firm name of E. Rigney & Co. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants take [260]*260writ of error: Subsequently there was a severance as to the defendant Rigney, and the cause proceeded in the name of Nathaniel Webster. The judgment is affirmed.
Decision Per Curiam.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webster v. Jones, 43 Fla. 259 (Fla. 1901).
43 Fla. 259 (Webster v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.