Webster v. Hubley
This text of 32 A.2d 684 (Webster v. Hubley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The validity of the covenant not to sue may be litigated in the action at law. Schofield v. Company, 90 N. H. 31; Dion v. Mills, ante, 414. The construction of the declaratory judgment statute (R. L., c. 370, s. 20) barring its service when other remedy is available and adequate (Gitsis v. Thornton, 91 N. H. 192, and cases cited) therefore required the dismissal of the petition. The reasons assigned for a reversal of the construction or for an exception to it in the case are not sufficiently impressive to invite discussion.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.2d 684, 92 N.H. 431, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-v-hubley-nh-1943.