Webster v. Gates

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2010·No. 09-2079·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2079

KIRK E. WEBSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

JOHN HILD; JEROME TOWNSEND; KEITH CODDINGTON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01107-RWT)

Submitted: April 19, 2010 Decided: May 5, 2010

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk E. Webster, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Kirk E. Webster appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action claiming

violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2006) and Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Webster v. Gates, No.

8:07-cv-01107-RWT (D. Md. July 22, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webster v. Gates, (4th Cir. 2010).

Webster v. Gates (Webster v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related