Webster v. Blodgett

59 N.H. 120
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bingham, J.

A parol agreement to lease land, and buildings to be erected thereon, for ten years, is a contract to convey an interest in lands, and within the statute of frauds. G. L., c. 220, s. 14; c. 1, s. 20; c. 135, ss. 4, 12; Moore v. Ross, 11 N. H. 547, 552; Whitney v. Swett, 22 N. H. 10; Crosby v. Wadsworth, 6 East 602. A parol contract for the purchase of an interest in land is not taken put of the statute of frauds by part payment. Lane v. Shackford, 5 N. H. 133; Ayer v. Sawkes, 11 N. H. 148; Ham v. Goodrich, 37 N. H. 185; Emery v. Smith, 46 N. H. 151, 155; Luey v. Bundy, 9 N. H. 298; Folsom v. Company, 9 N. H. 355; Crawford v. Parsons, 18 N. H. 293; Kingsley v. Holbrook, 45 N. H. 313; Howe v. Batchelder, 49 N. H. 204.

Verdict set aside.

Clark and'Stanley, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webster v. Blodgett, 59 N.H. 120 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 120 (Webster v. Blodgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foley v. Foley
7 A.2d 396 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1939)
McCrillis v. American Heel Co.
155 A. 410 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1931)