Webster v. Bernheim

Supreme Court of Florida

Webster v. Bernheim

43 Fla. 256

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1901·Published

Opinion

This action was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error and E. Rigney, as late co-partners under the firm name of E. Rigney & Co. There [257]*257was judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendants take writ of error: Subsequently there was a severance as to the defendant Rigney, and the cause proceeded in the name of Nathaniel Webster. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision Per Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error and E. Rigney, as late co-partners under the firm name of E. Rigney & Co. There [257]*257was judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendants take writ of error: Subsequently there was a severance as to the defendant Rigney, and the cause proceeded in the name of Nathaniel Webster. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision Per Curiam.

Webster v. Bernheim, 43 Fla. 256 (Fla. 1901).

Pincite

43 Fla. 256 (Webster v. Bernheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.