Webster, Melvin AKA Webster, Melvin Lamar Jr.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 22, 2010
DocketWR-74,429-01
StatusPublished

This text of Webster, Melvin AKA Webster, Melvin Lamar Jr. (Webster, Melvin AKA Webster, Melvin Lamar Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Webster, Melvin AKA Webster, Melvin Lamar Jr., (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. WR-74,429-01 & 74,429-02

EX PARTE MELVIN WEBSTER

AKA MELVIN LAMAR WEBSTER, JR., Applicant



ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 07F0583-005 & 06F0741-005 IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to five years' imprisonment in each. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his pleas were involuntary because his sentences are not being calculated concurrently with a sentence from Arkansas, as provided in the plea agreement. Though the habeas record does not include the plea agreement, the judgments state that "this sentence shall run concurrent with any Arkansas sentences the defendant may be currently serving." Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681, 682 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's Office of the General Counsel to obtain an affidavit detailing how applicant's sentences are being calculated including all dates he has been in and out of custody. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that his plea was involuntary. Specifically, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the instant convictions are being credited with all time spent in Arkansas prisons under "any Arkansas sentences" the applicant was "currently serving" at the time applicant was sentenced in the instant cases. The trial court shall also make findings of fact as to whether applicant's plea agreement addressed pre-sentence jail time served on Arkansas sentences. The trial court shall supplement the habeas record with documentation of the plea bargain. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: September 22, 2010

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Huerta
692 S.W.2d 681 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Webster, Melvin AKA Webster, Melvin Lamar Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-melvin-aka-webster-melvin-lamar-jr-texcrimapp-2010.