Webster Manufacturing Co. v. Richmond Light & Railroad
This text of 181 A.D. 944 (Webster Manufacturing Co. v. Richmond Light & Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the grounds (a) that it was error to the substantial prejudice of the plaintiff to grant defendant’s request to charge that “ plaintiff cannot recover unless it proves the exact contract alleged,” because such contract was admitted by the pleadings and did not require otherwise to be proven; and (b) that the general tenor of the charge was erroneous to plaintiff’s prejudice in holding, in effect, that as to the alleged implied warranty the burden of proof rested on the plaintiff. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webster-manufacturing-co-v-richmond-light-railroad-nyappdiv-1917.