Weber v. Weber

1922 OK 159, 206 P. 823, 86 Okla. 139, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 125
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 2, 1922·No. 12961·Published

Opinion

MeNEILL, J.

This is -a divorce action in which defendant in error was awarded a divorce absolute and alimony, and from which judgment' plaintiff in error has- appealed. On the 7th day of March, '1922, this court made an order directing plaintiff in error to pay defendant in error $250 alimony pendente lite, and the further sum of $150 on the 1st day of each month until final determination of the action. Plaintiff in error has failed to comply with this order, and has failed to make a sufficient showing for not so doing, and is in contempt. The defendant in error moves the court to dismiss the appeal on authority of Spradling v. Spradling, 74 Oklahoma, 181 Pac. 148, end Hanshig v. Hanging, 76 Okla. 34, 183 Pac. 97S.

Hpon authority of the above cases, the appeal is dismissed.

HARRISON, C. J., and JOHNSON, KEN-NAMER, and NIOHODSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weber v. Weber, 1922 OK 159, 206 P. 823, 86 Okla. 139, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 125 (Okla. 1922).

1922 OK 159 (Weber v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spradling v. Spradling
1919 OK 23 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Hansing v. Hansing
1919 OK 263 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)