Weber v. State

58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616 (Weber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weber v. State, 58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616 (Ohio 1898).

Opinion

By the Court.

The power to stay the execution of a sentence, in whole or in part, in a criminal case, is inherent in every court having final jurisdiction in such cases, unless otherwise provided by statute. The suspension being in favor of the prisoner, is for his benefit, and is valid whether consented to by him or not. When the suspension is upon conditions expressed in the judgment, the prisoner has the rig’ht to rely upon such conditions, and so long as he complies therewith the suspension will stand.

But when the suspension is without express conditions, as in this case, it is within the power of the court to set aside the suspension at any time during the same term, on its own motion, and to order the sentence to be executed.

Cases cited by counsel are to the effect that the suspension may be set aside at a subsequent term; but this ease does not require us to go to that extent, because here the suspension was set aside at the same term at which sentence was passed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-state-ohio-1898.