Weber v. State

411 So. 2d 315, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19632
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 1982·No. No. 81-1342·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of an adverse jury verdict and sentence accordingly, after being charged with attempted murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. He urges two points for reversal: The ineffectiveness of counsel and illegal sentence.

We affirm, without prejudice to the appellant raising these issues initially in the trial court. Combs v. State, 403 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981); Valero v. State, 393 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Cannon v. State, 384 So.2d 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weber v. State, 411 So. 2d 315, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19632 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 315 (Weber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romano v. State
648 So. 2d 329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Weber v. State
501 So. 2d 1379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)