Weber v. Sidney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weber v. Sidney

24 A.D.2d 753, 263 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3171

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 753 (Weber v. Sidney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weber v. Sidney, 24 A.D.2d 753, 263 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on June 15, 1965 modifying judgment dated July 15, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, and motion denied but without prejudice to a plenary action or other relief. The judgment herein determined the rights of the individual parties in regard to the corporate defendant. It did not purport to provide, nor can it be used as a vehicle for, the court’s supervising the management of the corporation. The amendment granted does that. If plaintiff is aggrieved by the subsequent developments, he is not precluded from seeking relief by appropriate procedures. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on June 15, 1965 modifying judgment dated July 15, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, and motion denied but without prejudice to a plenary action or other relief. The judgment herein determined the rights of the individual parties in regard to the corporate defendant. It did not purport to provide, nor can it be used as a vehicle for, the court’s supervising the management of the corporation. The amendment granted does that. If plaintiff is aggrieved by the subsequent developments, he is not precluded from seeking relief by appropriate procedures. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 753, 263 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-sidney-nyappdiv-1965.