Weber v. Ryder TRS, Inc.

49 A.D.3d 865, 854 N.Y.2d 480
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 865 (Weber v. Ryder TRS, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weber v. Ryder TRS, Inc., 49 A.D.3d 865, 854 N.Y.2d 480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[866]*866A party must provide duly executed and acknowledged written authorizations for the release of pertinent medical records when that party has waived the physician-patient privilege by affirmatively putting his or her physical or mental condition in issue (see CPLR 3121 [a]; Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278 [1989]; Cynthia B. v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 60 NY2d 452, 456-457 [1983]; Diamond v Ross Orthopedic Group, P.C., 41 AD3d 768 [2007]), and CPLR 3101 (a) requires full disclosure of all evidence material and necessary to the prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of the burden of proof (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403 [1968]). Here, information as to the nature and severity of the injured plaintiffs previous right shoulder injury and right shoulder surgery are material and necessary to the issue of damages, if any, recoverable for a claimed loss of enjoyment of life due to the current injuries sustained by him in the subject motor vehicle accident (see Diamond v Ross Orthopedic Group, P.C., 41 AD3d at 769; Vanalst v City of New York, 276 AD2d 789 [2000]). Accordingly, that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to compel the plaintiff Samuel Weber, Jr., to provide authorizations for the release of his medical records pertaining to a prior right shoulder injury and surgery should have been granted. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 31925(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Cruz v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 31529(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Gumbs v. Flushing Town Center III, L.P.
114 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Vodoff v. Mehmood
92 A.D.3d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
GOETCHIUS, JOYCE A. v. SPAVENTO, M.D., PERRY J.
84 A.D.3d 1712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Abdalla v. Mazl Taxi, Inc.
66 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
D.M. v. J.E.M.
23 Misc. 3d 584 (NYC Family Court, 2009)
Corbey v. Allam
58 A.D.3d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 865, 854 N.Y.2d 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-ryder-trs-inc-nyappdiv-2008.