Weber v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
This text of 100 A. 992 (Weber v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While there is some difference in the recollection of the witnesses in this case as to the actual facts, they all agree that the collision occurred almost immediately after the deceased attempted to drive on the track, and the correct conclusion of the court below was that, if he had looked, as it was his duty to do, he would have seen the car running rapidly towards him, so close to where he was about to cross as to have made it contributory negligence on his part to attempt to take the risk. For this reason the judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 A. 992, 256 Pa. 595, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-philadelphia-rapid-transit-co-pa-1917.