Weber v. Oliver

Fourth Circuit

Weber v. Oliver

575 F. App'x 162

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2353

StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 162 (Weber v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weber v. Oliver, 575 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Melissa Sue Dancy Oliver appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Janine Perry Weber’s motion to dismiss Oliver’s claims against Weber. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Weber v. Oliver, No. 2:13-cv-00031-RGD-LRL (E.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Melissa Sue Dancy Oliver appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Janine Perry Weber’s motion to dismiss Oliver’s claims against Weber. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Weber v. Oliver, No. 2:13-cv-00031-RGD-LRL (E.D.Va. Oct. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 F. App'x 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-oliver-ca4-2014.