Weber v. Levine

281 A.D.2d 474, 721 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2340
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated June 12, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendants Muriel Kaiser and Horton Memorial Hospital for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondents.

There is a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff Heidi Weber’s bedrails were in the raised position, thereby requiring the denial of the respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them (see, CPLR 3212; see generally, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weber v. Levine, 281 A.D.2d 474, 721 N.Y.S.2d 560, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 474 (Weber v. Levine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorber v. Prospect Park Nursing Home, Inc.
289 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)