Weber v. Henderson

Supreme Court

Weber v. Henderson

322 U.S. 713, 64 S. Ct. 1270

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 29, 1944·No. No. 992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Memphis v. United States, 97 U. S. 293, 295, 297; McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co., 185 U. S. 505, 510-13; Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-30; Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall, 309 U. S. 370, 377-79. (2) Richmond Mortgage Corp. v. Wachovia Bank Co., 300 U. S. 124, 130-31; Gelfert v. National City Bank, 313 U. S. 221, 235.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Memphis v. United States, 97 U. S. 293, 295, 297; McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co., 185 U. S. 505, 510-13; Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-30; Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall, 309 U. S. 370, 377-79. (2) Richmond Mortgage Corp. v. Wachovia Bank Co., 300 U. S. 124, 130-31; Gelfert v. National City Bank, 313 U. S. 221, 235.

Weber v. Henderson, 322 U.S. 713, 64 S. Ct. 1270 (1944).

Pincite

322 U.S. 713 (Weber v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related