Weber v. Henderson

Supreme Court

Weber v. Henderson

322 U.S. 713, 64 S. Ct. 1270

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 29, 1944

DocketNo. 992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 U.S. 713 (Weber v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weber v. Henderson, 322 U.S. 713, 64 S. Ct. 1270 (1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Memphis v. United States, 97 U. S. 293, 295, 297; McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co., 185 U. S. 505, 510-13; Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-30; Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall, 309 U. S. 370, 377-79. (2) Richmond Mortgage Corp. v. Wachovia Bank Co., 300 U. S. 124, 130-31; Gelfert v. National City Bank, 313 U. S. 221, 235.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Memphis v. United States, 97 U. S. 293, 295, 297; McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co., 185 U. S. 505, 510-13; Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-30; Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall, 309 U. S. 370, 377-79. (2) Richmond Mortgage Corp. v. Wachovia Bank Co., 300 U. S. 124, 130-31; Gelfert v. National City Bank, 313 U. S. 221, 235.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 U.S. 713, 64 S. Ct. 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-henderson-scotus-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack