Weber v. GAF Corp.
This text of 5 F.3d 1492 (Weber v. GAF Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
5 F.3d 1492
Weber (Richard J., Rose Marie)
v.
GAF Corporation, Raymark Industries, Inc., Celotex Corp.,
Successor in Interest to Philip Carey Mfg. Co., Philip Carey
Corp., Briggs Mfg. Co., Panacon Corp., Keene Building
Products Corp., Eagle Picher Industries, Inc., Forty Eight
Insulations, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v.
Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co.,
Manville Corproation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund
NO. 90-3563
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
July 23, 1993
Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,
Bloch, J.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F.3d 1492, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25597, 1993 WL 378866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-gaf-corp-ca3-1993.