Home/Third Circuit/Weber v. GAF Corp.

Weber v. GAF Corp.

5 F.3d 1492, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25597, 1993 WL 378866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weber v. GAF Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 F.3d 35 →
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 23, 1993·No. 90-3563·Published

Opinion

5 F.3d 1492

Weber (Richard J., Rose Marie)
v.
GAF Corporation, Raymark Industries, Inc., Celotex Corp.,
Successor in Interest to Philip Carey Mfg. Co., Philip Carey
Corp., Briggs Mfg. Co., Panacon Corp., Keene Building
Products Corp., Eagle Picher Industries, Inc., Forty Eight
Insulations, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v.
Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co.,
Manville Corproation Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund

NO. 90-3563

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

July 23, 1993

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

Bloch, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weber v. GAF Corp., 5 F.3d 1492, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25597, 1993 WL 378866 (3d Cir. 1993).

5 F.3d 1492 (Weber v. GAF Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.