Weber v. Franklin General Hospital

56 A.D.2d 598, 391 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10670

This text of 56 A.D.2d 598 (Weber v. Franklin General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weber v. Franklin General Hospital, 56 A.D.2d 598, 391 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 17, 1975, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of respondents and against him. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The rule stated in Zeleznik v Jewish Chronic Disease Hosp. (47 AD2d 199, 206), that it is improper for a party "to offer his expert’s personal opinion of the medical community standard as to the risks to be disclosed”, does not prohibit expert testimony as to the risks of specified treatment, and whether such risks should have been disclosed. We have considered the other allegations of error claimed by the plaintiff and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zeleznik v. Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital
47 A.D.2d 199 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 598, 391 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weber-v-franklin-general-hospital-nyappdiv-1977.