Weber v. Columbia Amusement Co.

154 A.D. 882, 138 N.Y.S. 879
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1912·No. No. 2·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from required the defendant to make and serve a verified bill of particulars of the facts set up in the affirmative defense. It was the necessity for obtaining the evidence from the plaintiff to establish said affirmative defense which authorized the making of the order for his examination before trial, affirmed in the opinion herein handed down this day. (Weber v. Columbia Amusement Co., No. 1, ante, p. 881.) To require defendant to furnish a bill of particulars in advance of obtaining the evidence necessary to make it seems incongruous. The two orders were made upon the same date and should not be outstanding at the same timé. This order is reversed, with leave to renew after the examination before trial of the plaintiff is completed, without costs to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin,. Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order reversed, without costs, with leave to renew as slated in opinion. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weber v. Columbia Amusement Co., 154 A.D. 882, 138 N.Y.S. 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

154 A.D. 882 (Weber v. Columbia Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cornell v. Mor-Nell Development Corp.
43 Misc. 2d 1086 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Corlett v. Kiefer
34 Misc. 2d 325 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Carney v. Liebmann Breweries, Inc.
8 Misc. 2d 1064 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Eisenstaedt v. Schweitzer
3 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)