Weber v. Clark

24 Minn. 354, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 151
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 31, 1877·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

Defendant owned a farm of two hundred acres, and agreed to pay Weber one hundred dollars if he [355]*355would find a purchaser for it. Weber found a purchaser for one hundred and seventeen acres of the farm, who purchased -that quantity from defendant. Weber sued for one hundred dollars.

Clearly he was not entitled to recover anything. The contract was entire that Weber should find a purchaser for the whole farm, and that for doing so defendant should pay bim one hundred dollars. Weber was not entitled to anything until he performed his part of the contract, and found a purchaser willing to buy the whole farm. This he did not do.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weber v. Clark, 24 Minn. 354, 1877 Minn. LEXIS 151 (Mich. 1877).

24 Minn. 354 (Weber v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmer v. Simmer, Jr.
261 N.W. 481 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
Vere v. Rosafa
11 P.R. Fed. 325 (D. Puerto Rico, 1919)
Farmer v. Holmes
160 N.W. 143 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Bentley v. Edwards
146 N.W. 347 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Crawford v. Surety Investment Co.
139 P. 481 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
McGrath v. Cannon
57 N.W. 150 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1893)
Nelichka v. Esterly
12 N.W. 457 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1882)