Weber v. Anderson

Fourth Circuit

Weber v. Anderson

482 F. App'x 859

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. 12-7282·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Weber v. Anderson, 2012 WL 2675449 (D.S.C. July 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Weber v. Anderson, 2012 WL 2675449 (D.S.C. July 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Weber v. Anderson, 482 F. App'x 859 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

482 F. App'x 859 (Weber v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related