Weber Implement Co. v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Weber Implement Co. v. Hill

123 S.W. 547, 139 Mo. App. 522, 1909 Mo. App. LEXIS 520

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 6, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 S.W. 547 (Weber Implement Co. v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weber Implement Co. v. Hill, 123 S.W. 547, 139 Mo. App. 522, 1909 Mo. App. LEXIS 520 (Mo. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLISON, J. —

This action was begun before a justice of the peace on a promissory note. On appeal to the circuit court judgment was rendered for the defendant and plaintiff appealed.

The record presented does not show that any motion for new trial was filed. Nor does it show the filing of a bill of exceptions. These things appear in what purports to be a bill of exceptions, but the place for them is in the record proper.

After defendant had prepared his briefs and made the point, plaintiff then asked leave of court to file a supplemental abstract and without obtaining such leave did file such supplement. This cannot be allowed over the objection of the other party. [Harding v. Bedoll, [525]*525202 Mo. 625; Everett v. Butler, 192, Mo. 564; Redd v. Railroad, 122 Mo. App. 93; Cross v. Henderson, 129 Mo. App. 537.]

There being no matter of exception before ns we are left to the record proper and finding no error therein the judgment will be affirmed. [Thompson v. Ruddick, 213 Mo. 561; Macon v. Jaeger, 133 Mo. App. 643; Stark Bros. v. Martin, 126 Mo. App. 575.]

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI