Webber v. Truax
This text of 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 242 (Webber v. Truax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Marine Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the territorial jurisdiction of the marine court is limited to the county of New York, its judges cannot perform judicial functions in other counties. As the court itself does not possess such power, it cannot confer it by any form of delegation upon a referee. The order directing the referee to take the plaintiff’s examination at Flushing, Queens county, was therefore a, nullity (Bonner n. Phail, 31 Barb. 107). The special term judge ought, therefore, to have granted the plaintiff’s motion, and his refusal to do so is error, for which the order appealed from must be reversed and the original order for examination vacated, with costs.
GIoepp and Hawes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webber-v-truax-nymarct-1880.