Webber v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webber v. State

931 So. 2d 169, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2006 WL 1288605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 2006

DocketNo. 5D05-1677

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 931 So. 2d 169 (Webber v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Webber v. State, 931 So. 2d 169, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2006 WL 1288605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Edward James Webber, Jr., seeks certiorari review of an order denying and dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court. We treat the petition as an appeal pursuant to Bostic v. State, 875 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Having carefully reviewed the record before us, as well as the provisions of section 28.213, Florida Statutes (2005), we conclude that the trial court was correct in its ruling and affirm.

. AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINQER, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Edward James Webber, Jr., seeks certiorari review of an order denying and dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court. We treat the petition as an appeal pursuant to Bostic v. State, 875 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Having carefully reviewed the record before us, as well as the provisions of section 28.213, Florida Statutes (2005), we conclude that the trial court was correct in its ruling and affirm.

. AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINQER, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

931 So. 2d 169, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2006 WL 1288605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webber-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack