Webber v. State
931 So. 2d 169, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2006 WL 1288605
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2006·No. No. 5D05-1677·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant, Edward James Webber, Jr., seeks certiorari review of an order denying and dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court. We treat the petition as an appeal pursuant to Bostic v. State, 875 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Having carefully reviewed the record before us, as well as the provisions of section 28.213, Florida Statutes (2005), we conclude that the trial court was correct in its ruling and affirm.
. AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Webber v. State, 931 So. 2d 169, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2006 WL 1288605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
931 So. 2d 169 (Webber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morales v. Marques
931 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)