Webber v. Osgood
This text of 38 A. 730 (Webber v. Osgood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the time of the attachment, Brown had the title to the organ and the right to -its possession, — the plaintiff having failed to make payments in . accordance with her agreement. Bailey v. Colby, 34 N. H. 29; McFarland v. Farmer, 42 N. H. 386, 391; Proctor v. Tilton, 65 N. H. 3, 4. The surrender of the possession to Hutchinson, to whom Brown had sold and transferréd his title and right of possession, was a surrender to *235 the owner and a discharge of the defendant’s duty. Littlefield v. Davis, 62 N. H. 492. The plaintiff, having no title and no right of possession, has no cause of complaint on account of such surrender.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A. 730, 68 N.H. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/webber-v-osgood-nh-1894.