Webber v. Osgood

38 A. 730, 68 N.H. 234
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1894·Published

Opinion

Chase, J.

At the time of the attachment, Brown had the title to the organ and the right to -its possession, — the plaintiff having failed to make payments in . accordance with her agreement. Bailey v. Colby, 34 N. H. 29; McFarland v. Farmer, 42 N. H. 386, 391; Proctor v. Tilton, 65 N. H. 3, 4. The surrender of the possession to Hutchinson, to whom Brown had sold and transferréd his title and right of possession, was a surrender to *235 the owner and a discharge of the defendant’s duty. Littlefield v. Davis, 62 N. H. 492. The plaintiff, having no title and no right of possession, has no cause of complaint on account of such surrender.

Judgment for the defendant.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webber v. Osgood, 38 A. 730, 68 N.H. 234 (N.H. 1894).

38 A. 730 (Webber v. Osgood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proctor v. Tilton
17 A. 638 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1888)
Littlefield v. Davis
62 N.H. 492 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1883)