Webber Commercial Properties, LLC v. Mama Vagne Enterprises, Inc., Md Zahirul Haque Bhuiyuan, Shar Faraj, Syed S. Alam, and Tammana C. Ahmed

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: May 1, 2026
• Docket: 6D2025-0396
• Status: Published

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2025-0396 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-CA-002863 _____________________________

WEBBER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

MAMA VAGNE ENTERPRISES, INC., MD ZAHIRUL HAQUE BHUIYUAN, SHAR FARAJ, SYED S. ALAM, and TAMMANA C. AHMED,

Appellees. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County. Michael T. McHugh, Judge.

May 1, 2026

PER CURIAM.

Webber Commercial Properties, LLC appeals the trial court’s nonfinal order

on its summary proceedings for possession and Appellees’ motion to determine

rents. We affirm the parts of the order on Appellant’s summary proceedings for

possession without further discussion. As to the challenge to the parts of the order

on Appellees’ motion to determine rents, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) (“Appeals to the district courts of appeal of

nonfinal orders are limited to those that . . . determine . . . the right to immediate possession of property.”); Aqua Bay Luxury Apartments, Inc. v. Ivory at Bay

Harbour, LLC, 406 So. 3d 1100, 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (dismissing for lack of

jurisdiction the appeal of an order on a motion to determine rents because the order

is not enumerated in rule 9.130(a)(3) and was not the basis for the issuance of the

writ of possession); see also Walker v. Fla. Gas Transmission Co., LLC, 134 So. 3d

571, 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“[T]he categories of non-final orders subject to

interlocutory appeal are narrowly construed.” (citing Travelers Ins. Co. v. Bruns,

443 So. 2d 959, 961 (Fla. 1984))); Greene v. Borsky, 961 So. 2d 1057, 1058–60 (Fla.

4th DCA 2007) (Farmer, J., dissenting) (analyzing rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) and

concluding that it applied only to orders determining the right to immediate

possession of tangible personal property or real property, not to orders determining

the amount of a debt).

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

STARGEL, WHITE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.

Brian D. Zinn, of Zinnlaw, PLLC, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Jack C. Morgan, III, of Aloia Roland Lubell & Morgan PLLC, Fort Myers, for Appellees, Mama Vagne Enterprises, Inc., MD Zehirul Haque Bhauiyuan, Syed S. Alam, and Tammana C. Ahmed.

Matthew S. Toll, of Toll Law, Cape Coral, for Appellee, Shar Faraj.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED