Webb, Willard K

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 8, 2015
• Docket: WR-83,464-01
• Status: Published

Opinion

Date: June 4, 2015

Attn: Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Texas Court of Crimina]. Appeals P.OB. 12308! Capitol Station Austin, Tx. 78711

RE: Relator's First Writ of Mandamus

Cause No: 1278106 Style: The State of Texas v. Willard K. Webb

Dear C1 e r..- k ; Please find enclosed Relator's First Writ of Mandamus t:o be filed with the pr'Yper Court for review .;md disposition. Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter.

Cordially, '/, ~ /s/~ Willard K. Webb #1713120 ALLRED UNIT 2101 FM 369 N. Iowa Park, Tx. 76367

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUN 08.2015 CC: file/WKW

Abe\ Acosta, Clert< IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

§ EX PARTEi § CAUSE NO: 1278106 WILLARD K. WEBB § APPEAL NO: 01-ll-00403-CR v. § THE 179th JUDICIAL § PDR NO: Unknow I filed on DISTRICT COURT OF § June 1, 2012 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § HON. JUDGE PRESIDING; § DISTRICT CLERK OF § HARRIS COUNTY, CHRIS DANIEL.; § CHIEF DISTKICT ATTORNET, Michael§ Anderson, FOR HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS.

RELATORS PRIST APPLICATION ~OR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

• .. ·.. : ...,,

' TO TH~ HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Comes now, WILLARD K. WEBB, EX PARTE, in the above styled cause of action and proce~ding files this first Application For Wirt MAN= DAMUS, pursuant to ARTICLE 1, § 9 of the TEXAS CONSTITUTIONAL and the TEXAS RULES of APPELAmES PROCEDURE.

In support of this complint the relator will sho.w that he has a legal right secured under, including, but not necessarily limited to, Article 1, § 12, to the texas coristitution Article 1, § 9, the first, fifth, and fourteenth Amendments to the United States Contitu- tion, as well as the mandatory provision set forth by the Texas Leg- islature under Article 10.07, section 1-7 and that the State has a legal duty to perform in this action.

Relator will also s~ that the state th~ough its agents/officials doing business in the State of Texas, Southern District, under colot of State law and/or office, either acted in concert one with the other in order to advance or further a common scheme or goal to deprive Rel- '-· .:.:.• . ... ator of his liberty interest, due process of law, equal protection right, and other, and other ri0hts and/or priviledges secured under the United States Constitution ~nd/or laws of the United State and the State of Texas.

I.

Relator, WILLARD K. WEBB, TDCJ # 1713120, is illegaly restra- ined of his liberty by the Texa3 Department of Criminal Justice-c~r­ cectional Institutioal Division at the : JAMES v. ALLRED Unit, lo~ated in IOWA PARK, TEXAS-WICHITA COUNTY, following conviction by Jiry trial

1. D D on or about February 23, 2012, in the !79th Ju.ict~ll~istrict court of HARRIS County, HJUSTON TEXAS under cause no: 127810Q and; Subse- quently sentenced to a term of (45) Years imprisonment for the felo~y offense of murd~r. Relator has exhausted his rimedies in an attempt to exercise his rights secured under both the T€xas State Constit:~tion and the United States Constitution pertaining to the Writ of Habeas Corpus and has no other adequate State remedy available to him in this action to compel the ~tate and its AGENTS~OFFICIALS to fulfil thier minis~erial duties specificallyi but not limited to, provioing the Relator with the rele- vant information pertaining to cause No:l278106 in order for Relator to abtain th~ necessary Trial Transcript, CLERKS RECORD, and EXHIBITS but not limited to, filed in the HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERKS Office and in the Custody of ~he HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK: CHRIS DANIELj, The acl sought to be completed is ministerial, not Discretionary in natur.e, as it is stated in the Texas code of Criminal Procedure Articla 2. 21- duty o:l: Clerks. As of June 2, 2015 the District Clerk has failed to cornpl.ywith Relators prior requests for an itemized inventory of the Records, Doc~ments and EXHIBITS, but not limited to, filed and in custody of CHRIS DANIELS under cause NO: 1278106/STATE OF TEXAS V. WILLARD K. WEBB, also; failed to comply w·i th Relators prior requests and inquiries aa to the "total fees'' ewquired bythe office of the Dictrict Clerk in oraer for Relator to purchase copies of the requested Records, Documents and EXHIBITS, but not kexexkasxim~iNge~x®NxReiat®xsxEi~kkxk® limited to. The District Clerks Deliberate delay here has inpinged on Relators right to prepare and file his state 11.07 Writ of Habeas Cor- pus, challenging the V&lidity of his Conviction.

II.

Relator here in cause NO: 1273106-first requested information and Records properly to the District Clerk of HARRIS COUNTY, in about Septemb•?r of 2013, (See; Relators EXHIBIT~-' '~ncertified copy). Relators Second inquiry and re1uest for information and Records pro- perly to the Distr ic i: Clerk of .HARRIS COUNTY on February 25, 2014, specifically requesting an "Itemized Index of the statements of facts and Transcripts in Cause NO: 1278106 " (See, Relators EXHIBIT~: re- quest to CHRIS DANIEALI Dated 2-25-2014); Relators Third inquiry and request for information and records, but not limited to properly to the Distrct Cl~rk office file Date stamped on April 24, 2015 (See, Relators EXHIBIT 3. letter addre- ssed to CHRIS DANIELl District Clerk Date Aerill7-; 2015); Relators Fourth inquiry and request f~r trial Transcripts andre- cords by 'day of "motion" to the Honorable Judge Presiding in the ,l 79th Judicial District Court on or about A-PRi'1 fl(l 1 2015. (Relator is u,qable '!J· to provide this Court with a copy of said Motion) .fGt::t;i t2-ei~JN £X, AS of JUne 4, 2015, the State and its Agents/O~ficials have failed to reply to and take action in fulfilling RElators requests,

2. therefore, violating his constitutional and statutory right~ to seek Habeas relief by way of the District Clerks office of Harris County. The District Clerks unecessary and deliberte delay and noncompliance of its ministerial duties deprive Relator of liberty interests, Due process of law, equal protection right and other priviledges ace-· corded under Article 1,§ 9 to the u.s. constitution and Article 1, i 12 of the Texas Constitution, through and by knowingly and intentionally Falling to abide bu, artd to thereby violate by acts of ommission, statutes and/br codes of the State of Texas govering said rigfts and/o~ priviledges, aS well as laws of the United States. The State th~ough its agents/officials willful and intentional failure to ~i~e abicje by the statutory procedures authorized by the Texas legis- latilre injures Relator right to the Writ Habeas Corpus as guaranteed by th~~ United States Constitution and only benefits the State and pre- judices the Relator. Said same named agents/officials below for this purposes of tfuis complaint are State actors doing business ir1 the State of Texaa, sou- t~ern District, Harris County under color of State law and/or office either acting in concert one wj.th the other in order to advance or further a common scheme or goal to deprive Relator of his Constitu- tional rights to the Writ of Habe~s COrpus and have failed to take preventative or corrective measures while having the opportunity to do so.

III. PARTIES

1. State agents/officials-Chris Daniel i~ the District Clerk of Harris County, Texas acting in his official capa~ity M.r aaniel has authority to promulgate policies, rules, regulations, procedures, and practices governi~g the operation and daily operation of the office of the Harris Countv District Clerks office. Through his duties, Mr. Daniel conducts business throughout the State. in- cluding the sotithern District.

2. State agents~/official-Hon KRISTIN M. GUINEY is a Judge of the !79th Judicial District Court of Harris Count¥, Texas, acting in her official capacity, the Honorable Kristin M. Guiney has the authority to promulgate policies, rules, regulations, procedures, and prctices for the operation and daily operation of the !79th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. Through her i]uties the Honorable Kristin M. Guinev is conducting business throughout the St~te-including the Southern-Federal District of Texas.

The above ;nentioned officials/agents of the State have failed to abide by the mandat(>ry language of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 11.07 et seq., and Article 2.21--Dtity of Clerk.

Relator alleges the States officials/agents jointly and severally, each have a high ~egree of education along with a duty and of obligation to kno~ the law; thereby establishing the States officials/ agents acterl knowingly.~~~eiat~~ further alle~es the States agents/

•3 officials acted knowingly and failed to take preventive measures to correct wrongful acts when having the opportunity to do so, this also establishes by silence and ommissions they acted in concert one with the other with the intent to cause the damage and injury of impediment to Relator and Relator's·rights, priviledges, and immunities secured unde~, including, but not necessarily limited to, Article I, § 12, to th~ Texas Constitution, Article I, § 9, the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the UnJted States Constitution, by violating the ;aandatory provisions set forth by the Texas Legislature under Article 11.07, et seq., and Article 2.21 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, in failing to perform their duties and obligations in following the mandatory language of Article 11.07, et seq., and Article 2.21 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, causing irreparable damage, h~rm and injury to Relator and his right to a writ of habeas. corpus under both the Texas Constitution and the United States Constitution. The Texas Constitution at Article I, § 12 provides: "The Writ of Habeas Corpus is a writ of right, and shall never be suspended. Th~ Legislature shall enact laws to render the remedy speedy and effectual."

The United States Constitution, Article I,§ 9, also holds: ''The privilede of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless in cases of rebellion the public safety may require it."

The State through its agents/officials herein are State actorS doing b~siness und~r color of law and/or office, acted with the intent to deprive Relator by practice and/or custom, of rights and privildges protected by the Constitutio~ and laws of the United States by failing to abide by, and thereby provide Relator Due Process of law and the Equal Protection of l~w, by circumventing th~ Te~as Code of Criminal Procedure, Artitle 11.07 et seq,, and Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk .

. IV

Article 11.07 Sections 3 (b)(c)(d), and Sections 6 and 7, and Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure were emasculated by t~1e State's agents/officials when the mandatory language contained therein, time frames, and procedures were ignored and/or neglected when the Harris Counties' District Clerks Office and the States agent/official namely: _Chris Daniel, but not limited tb,has knowingly and intentionally refused to provide Relator here with the necessary information as requested (See; Relator's Exhibits 1-4), in order and for the purpose of Relator seeking his Post ~viction Remedies via an Article 11.07 State writ of Habeas Corpus upon final conviction of his State Conviction and Sentence. The Stat~s agents/officials knowing and intentional acts to circumvent time frames and procedures were designed and purposed to cause Rel~tor damage and injury .

.4 In this cause the States agents/officials have substituted time frames and procedures of their own creation which had not been approved nor autho~ized by the Texas Legislature~ Through prejudicial overt act.~, material omissions, material misrepresentations;. and acts .of deceit and moral turpitude, compounded by guilty knowledge, the State agents/official:3 have promulgated and substituted alternative procedures to those authorized and enacted into law by the Texas Legislature. Article 11.07 et seq., was circumvented by the States agents/officials when implementation was frustrated by the adoption of an alternative Get of procedures. Evidence of moral turpitude can be drawn from these unauthorized time frames and procedures. Moral turpitude contemplates acts which tend to betray in an evil and dishonorable manner. The i' Legislature as well as Federal courts have been mislead to believe the time frames ancl 9rovisions implemented by the State are . I

those authorized by Article 11.07 et seq., and Article 2~21, when such is not the case. The State through its agents/officials enjoy a license to exercise unfettered and unchecked discretion. Outwardly, theSe time frames and procedures appear to be legitimate. Only a person thoroughly acquainted with l~~~and procedure would pick up the fatal flaw they incorporate~ Th~ State created the app~arnce of extending Relator's rights. to a writ of habeas corpus: to camouflage the fact that ther~were no actual provisions or time frames as set forth by the actual Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk being followed. It is dishonest to provide the outward appearnace that an actual right to a· writ of habeas corpus was being extended and granted, when , you know the provisions and time frames are unauthorized and therefore, counterfeit.

.v The Texas Legislature in ocder to carry out the mandate of the Texas Constitution Article I, § 12 andArticle I, § 9 of the United States Constitution, has decreed, via V.T.A.C.C.P., Article 11.07, every person whose liberty is under restraint by way of a final conviction has the right/priviledge to the writ of habeas corpu~ in order to determine the nature and cause for the restraint thereof, and to be discharged from such said restraint if determined illegal. Through prejudicial overt acts, material omissions, material misrepresentations and act~ of deceit and moral turpitude, compounded by guilty knowledge, the State through its agents/officials acting in their official capacities have a practice of holding star chamber like proceedings rather han .the proceedings authorized under V.T.A.C.C.P., Articles 11.07 et sQq., and Article 2.21- Duties of Clerk and Article I, § 12 of the Texas Constitution and Article I, § 9 to the United States Constitution. As a result of practices by the State actor(s), relator has been denied his right/priviledge to acces3 to the necessary ano fundamental trial transcripts, r:ecords and exhibits that

.5 arc~ cr~-~ial to the prepe:.r ing and filing of Relator's Post Convict ion State 11.07 et seq., Writ of Habeas Corpus in a timely manner. The a£~rementioned, documents and in~ormation are controll~d by and in the c~sto~y of the District Clerk's Off1ce of Harris _- County-Houston, Texas namely: Chris Daniel. The District Clerk',s·~ __,_'\· .. _ · · ·· misconduct h

PRAYER FOR RELIEF . ··}r.~... ., ~;. ~: ~~?~:~,:~~- Wherefore, Rs•la tor comes before this Honoral5~re-·~ Court of Criminal App~al':~:· of T-exas and prays that this cotf~(.wli-1 take :/' actionwi thin.:,':''"~'{·b1\ W:r'f.'lf;' of .. Habe.·as _:.Corpus. Th1s Honorable court has the':,'a~ud_lclal"·· - '· _ · po~~r ~nf 'Harris County District Clerks :9Jf./c~}?:J~[:,f;';':;"_;:j_ District Attorney's office and the Hon. Judge of the l79t'h;~\j-{_i'(f:i,9;,~1a.'1!;:~·'.::V:~· District Court I to fulfill. its legal ministerial d'uties' un:q~):f?\~!HtiftL' "':~ the provisions set_ forth in the V.T.A.C.C.P. 11.07 et··#.[~4sr!~~~:.::~':\- and Article 2.21-Duties of Clerk. :?\;::i~->.,.,'..-\,, ~ '·i~::·~ _;.~ :~\ ~~.!~~~. . .( SIGNED AND EXECUTED ON THIS DATE: June 4th of 2015. ..: . ... -.: .,

·'. Respectfully Submitted;

/sl-tt4/k//LV..dl (Rel~to~-Ex Parte, Willard K.' Webb)

Will~rd K. Webb #1713120 ALLRED UNIT ·' -'.·

~'-~- ~-J·:~;~ . . '':2101 FM 369 N. . . ~t~ ...~- . ;f-:-::tOWA PARK I TX. 7636 7 .I' .... ,, ·.·'.

.... ·

..... : · ,.,; ,y'' ....

,·. -~ f • '•. l '·

CC: File/WKW .fi ~- * '

.•·. APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF RELATOR'S APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (EXHIBITS 1-4) RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 1 ~~USl NO:. 10?7~/o~

.w\LL~RD w~BB .IN THE l7Cl +h" D1s·+Ric.t vs CDlJR·t FoR THE StATE D f ·T-EX\\S \-4A.RR\ S CDurrtY TEXAS

MoTi r~ 1ll +o o b-\- Cli n T1o ~o meJ"\t r:t nd Ior TR~·1L Rec.ofdS I_~ t=of'm 'PRu ·pus To t-\tf2. \-\o tu 0 \2_ PtBLE:) l) d s e... () F ~ {:~hd LolJ r·t: Co me. S \\lDu.J, Ull LL A-R D \JJ E_~B , ·p e -\-'\ -t-~ on '? ~c:) S E:. \ 1\.l +\JLS P._\r,ove ~nc~ ·t:are__9\Y\~ L4Se._ Af\d/or< c_.puse.cYt- AcJ- ·IoN~ Re_S'Pe~tFol\Y Re.-'1UQ.S-\-~n~ t'nls HofloRRh\e ~\)­ + R tD P-Llc) w ~ , M ·+-o ~ \ o c_e_e_ d \f\ ·r:-o r '{Y\e:t_ ·vo._Pos \f\ b h \S ~{(Q_ \Je-St ·\-o oh \-CA.\ f\ \R~rAL \Zec_ortl~ l CAV\cl o~e..r doc tJ YY\ er\ t sa> lo ·p ~.-r lone" 'n Vo ~tn~ ~R-t ~ 2o 5o And 2-ob(;, oF \Je_~­ \5 t\\o\\15 TeX. ~S · 5t0-..tlYte.S ~~uLF 127 o t: the Tt=-XJ4S -~u\e_ .. o·F V~Ac.-ttce \n ·the D~st~\c.:t- And Count/ Courts) OR-b 4o.D9 e-t. Se Ch OF .the. ·-1E IZ l=lS Code 6+- C Rtm. Pr<.oc_.T&\. #

bYef\ Recof'd:S Ac__t. b:l51- ·lr (A) \JoT:C Pel \Uhteh sho- LJlcl SuP'Port th,s t-\Dnr'?Rab\~ ~ooQ-\--·s Pf<-o~QR' Q-m LPwf·D\\ J'ofZLSd ~~+-tor'\~ . TI . ·-l h·\ S be~ r'\~ Pre.. sen teA 1vY Gcx::x:l- t- A\ +h; .So +hat YY\ o·i-tc:> n 'S +·he_ ·?eJ-'1-\- ·,one.\' ~n Db -t-~·t f\ Re._cord~ l=\Y\d l 01 ·+r1CAl C.OC>r-ls \=de.~ j CA.SS. 1S \- h \ m ·\n ·+-he. ?re.·\=tA00-..\-.,of\ o t= ·i-o r-t\d O.t\d h 1·S o.. \J'?Lt <:_&\-lot\ For w rt+ [l)':·F- \-.\-~ \oe-AS CoR. PoCO ~eltef for ·WR\+ oF '\-\CA'o~S e_oR_Pus, ·The ·K_e.q,ues-l-eddocomen1 ·-J: l S. ~ss ex\ t \Al foCQ. b-\lvY\ +a ~e'3eqec_h +he. GroL>rd s of Ff'Ko\6 ·-\-~CA \- ~ e \ S 1Y\4-eJU c\ 'w1 G ·to RoJ'Se o

'ill \>ettt~one\ 0-SSerts und·e(' ?enedt-1 o\= ?ef1ury--\-hqt-\v2 \ s w \t-~ o u+ the.- Fu'nc\ S. ·rro '\?er.-\-{es) \<.£C.-\ \.t t \ 6 CA0d o<'of.ha See-ur.\i-.teS \\\ W~\e.h to PCAV fo(l -\-he_ R-eC()0<2-s+-ed doOJm61f C\Y\cl Dr Re.C.ord So ·rhe- Do C.l) vnen~s o_nd k.e.eof'dS ShDo\d be- P·Ft=of'ClCL'o\e ~~ No CD Cb+ +o 4he ?e.t\ -\-,ol)e_\' Th\~ De_, f\~ +he_ C.u. ~ Such ~of\-\-e.n -\-\or{3; See:. Srn1+h vs/ ~e~~ n e_·t\- 5 ~ 5 U~ s '7-o9J LCLne VS. B\loW n 3 72. u. 5 . if 11', 2 3 5.(_+ I D I

·+ 6 ~) q b L o g_c\ ~ ct I (\'tJ6 )" £S·hAb \\ s\ted ~Ue.nueS, he\d btl *'Q Su.PRe..me.. C-oo0t) ~+-#\e._ Sh\-e tS Qe_ct>Otre.dlo€St- Qb\lS"" CAuenl.)f2-S e:>'F ,::l''PPeLLb.-t.e_ re..u~ew~ lfY\o.\(_tt\9t~l~oU: \=unda.me1\k>..L %4- *he. Couflt.s ~s-\u\o \\s~ ~e.SQ_ uuenues Wh\(.~ ~ \Ve.S eC(sUCA.\ 0LC..6S +-o +\\e ·~t-l ~loV\e r. ?e_-\-it-l'one.r CAS'3QMS ·+-~-\-- \ F -th~s e.ouf'-\- d€1\ \eS fut~ \Zect.,ue_'S-\- t=or ~f?. \J-er\-er\ re..c_o ,ds u.nd. or Doc..umrn~M 0€1'\~a\ tuhDu\J bQ I(\ clef ed- \)I 0 \0:.-\-taf\ 0 ~ L l ~ ~) ~VY\P-f\ ~·-­ Y\\e.nt t-o The., u, S C.o(ls..\-:-,.\-~on., To \YTJ \)ose 0--nY Fl,(\c\~~ eo(\d\ \,'o[)S U'Yof\ W\l) \nd\- 91-.ent -Pr t So~ e.." b t= ·~h~s 3~+-e. ~,~ ues +he pgf'3on o... r,·~- h+~-h~ ~~ ~ .. Fu~1-h-erme\'e. ~ . · . 4-· , ·- Soe_ ~or hLS Ltbe.r+v (") t \~ e_ PC\ d-l D Y\ -e._ r h c.t s C\._ r ~y\-- 4:-c:J e Q( Ucd I

~fa TE:C..IIDr\ ~ f +\r,e. \CA.u.J ' =:;ee_: L&ne. V s. ~ ~ c. .. n h Ke.\Y\ I 4-he. C.-oCJr'\- d OUJf\ ' ....:JU t-"\C\... W e- re..~ I=- F If lfY\e ~Q_ I='unclC\ VYle.n k\ Drt rl~- rr tJe~-,·~,·onec QL~:fSQr+S ~ -\JAe_ ~ Qe~(.)eSkd vec_ods Qnd, CJ r 'l\o C.0 m.QrJ- ~ · ·r>. f' P -e_.~S- e!\ ~l u l ~d h ,s. Y\ e..ed. ~o" ~.e._ re_LoodS lS -\-a ~SSISt ~lm tY\ +h-e_ 'fu~e_r -\'\'t\~~-\-ton h, t=: The.. Ve+\·hone-0 IS ~.f..,.}-\~ -b+he._ Qa_Cbl)ES{-ec~ Y'~rdsu~ C:>f' Dowm~, \fl ~ f'ci-ef' ·to Prove "'\S ~lLe_~e;..:h~n ,/~V\dtc be. r~lAte. tD \)reSQ.f\t ~'-S Grou""ds 0\= Ee.~~ \() o. ·kv- CJ0altde. L\ ~h-t . peJ-- l+lt='ll f? (' s ~s t \ + t \DrxA \ r\ S}~-\- l) w \Ll \::J e_ l> to \ 0-,+ed bQ.Yand Q.e 'Po.'r 't ~"'e.. \>re_Ve-f\+-ed ~m \>erfu'""g, h\'::l ~,91~ 'vlt- i-b r:1 \e.. 0--. wr,+ CJ ~ UCA~~s e..o·R.'0v~, due. \-o 4-he. l~c...."- OA.c\d ~Sene~ CJ 'F TR.\tA.\ e.our-t f eCorclS.

3[_ ?e+ ~-\..\ ~ 1)-Q. r· .e.n--kt ~ -e.d -\-o ~ e_ Sou ~+ ~1=-t-e.r ·f -e.c.ordS lS I

CA¥Jcl VJ\Ll 'Pr-e_ ~Q..Cl+ ~\S · 'U-onCJ f'&l£1l~ (.our-\- lOt~ (?AVo. R- -\-ttA\ L\6t a·~ th.Q_ \t-erns fuus~+: U) A-tFtd~u, t SU.::Of'M +o beFore +\Ae_ JQ5~'tc_e o t= Peuce, Artcl w"'\c_h tAJCA.S . ust2cl -to e:>b~lfl 0.-1\4 0.._ Q~JL6t u. x.AJr4/\\ (J.) f\J (:) m e ~ ~ 'Pef' Sol'\ cd\cl 0, (' Cl H-I Q.J& I w ~D to"-i LL n;; 0 --4-e Q~ Ct f'C'_:::. "'0. ~(1 '(\~+ 4-.ha DQ. '\= ~ \'\ ~G.. nt \ (\ .\-h, ~ C:.U S g .. -3-- (3)-1~~ roll Cl (\ e_S-\- f ePoct) bDo tl (\~ { e Por·f-, c.tnd t)Of\n\. _seLf+\ v'\ £b · (4) T h Q. t:\ d m of\ 1 ~ h l'Y\01 f -;I u d G e. YY\ P fl + OC'\d c; .czn .\-ex\ c._ II'\('; S hQ,t:'..-+. Q.oo r+'£:, ~ r d_a\'C1 ~"'~\ ~' r'ld ''(\G, ~ .. l SJE..l\.l·h re.. 'R 12.?or+ er's Q. e eo r d / cJ e d:_ :Q ~Cbrd . m Whe_re 't=Df'P \)(e..YY\\ se_s Q_of'\Std ..e-f'ed, oFFv--nd..or fQ.-G. OPe.+ -Pu \I Y \:>f'CLV£ ~+ -\.h,~ Uof\0 r~ bl12 eouri- lS ..:_

5 u e. 4--~ .P 'f\ e c__ e_ SS (7A r Y o c d Q r S +o \~v e. 4-h .Q_ 1 e <1< tJ.f' .C:Jed QPce0M ~ t1>. f\el h P-ur\ f'\G T ('CA-f\ 5 u ,b .Pd eAA~,d 4e Pe. t )+;- ~ f)Q( 'n Q_ G. '('CA (\ t e-c\ 0 Free... ~ PY W I th &LL CD.s t C\<;;6l)- J

V"Y\ e-d h y 4--.-h .e 6 -\-u.+(2_ ...

(; {' CAv'\-\ StJO----~ v+h P c 0. n d +=t) ~-\- ~e_{' ~ f' L1-P- I= ~J +h ~ ~~\'\t">f'rLh( .P QC) ur+ fY\CAY ~ &2.-€-'VJ _1 us+ euA d Pro Poo.

~ee_L A((~ +1on I w 1LL ARd w E.B ?J FeJ1+1of\ e.f, ?rb 1s e. lo0 (\CK t f\- i

C.().('Q~Ro.+ecl a+ ~e Polonst.v LJ\'\~-\-, TcX~S O.P'iJG-

C..c.x\---e.d n 4 3 ~ 7 2_ r: . W). 3£()' ~ 0 L I i/111~6to f) T~XC-\~ 713s / Vo\ ~ Qouf\~). Do "'.PCA.r ~y' De.cJ..ure e.tnd tJ[AVs ond~r # Q 'Pet\OA.( t- Y rn ~ Q.pc} or Y 4k+ ~~ Pbbue 6.Y\ rJ \c.o__ (t:J\A) fV~e- ~-~ f'l g., 1 -~ .\-ro·e C\..Y\d e.or(5'ecJ- YurSM+ tD 4e ~-\.u+e lu.Lll P~lof\ s'Ky' L) ntt 3?J/2 \=.m., ~5o 2;cu L1 V\Y\GS+ol\ , 1 ex r:+s --:r 7 35 J WILlord wCL.bh tt 1113 f20 ~LL 14n ~ PoLtJr\ sK.( u n (t 32512 F.m~35D Gou-fh Lll!JVlbs+on T£>0\S r13S/

- 5-.· RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 2 . ·~

To~ \..\D..rn('¥... · cr~s 'Uo..n'le..\S f

Da\ e.:. 2 / 2 5 i 2..o 1Lt

t: \t2-i.Cls ::,to...\-e_ 0 \) 5\-CA-\-emen\- o~ ·foL-ts. '\1. 1.) Tro..\'\ Sc..~ \'P-\-. \N \ll

\.~.c.J ~: \]1'3 \2.0

u n \'\ ~ ·Po\u n S ( ~ RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 3 \

. i

•••.1 ....J f,J ...:. n trr\· ~\ .. ,;..

\ '---------·--------.::::.::....:;:~/---· -·- --·

(

---- --------lf~---- /I - --

-------2¢/if __t~u___ /}1'(-___:&/c/J__ /Af_~t/ZI!?__IL~U_~ 1/8 ~i.'!LL'd__{_d_(f__y~----- - ,~ I D #zv_;J____~_L(i££1.£.__ ~ ~-~~<~--:4.~(~.)----~~-~_,c:.- .yt.t=I -#~F-~-t:=~l~~flRl._~---- K?-t-f(-_tiQif/(_ ___-r_;J.,_:(f'___ DEcz·c~______r_t _::i~£._tlfy_dt~o_e:?f s:~AI/Jt"'!t_l~t: __ r~+f-t4L.:!/JJ!LI)__iL~r- ~#~f _fd_cfvf)~_-. ~~~-t-t#i..l_dt/y_-tif,;q{_~{)_ ~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~:.-~~~~A~~~ _/ - I -

____.::£M_____ t~Ft3-F: •

fr-~C-tJ-orb~ (J __C_tf_&c~ _ or t/1~/\lo/- 0-Ct!_r-::Le ~-4£/F ~:~~-t~ ~,:,-;r;i~ __s;:;.ft-~cf O~IJ~F: ~t?!l-----v~, ,_ __________________________ ________p-k,,wt/fk7 &:a~ ~---_________:__ _ RELATOR'S EXHIBIT 4

(Note: Relator here is unable to provide this Court with a copy of the "Motion for Transcripts'' filed with the 179th Judicial Dist,rict Court on or about the 22nd. day of April, 2015 and requests that this Court obtain a copy if necessary from the District Clerk of said Court nam•:~ly: _Chris Daniel). WILLARI: I· ,,,/ 1/ 111·1 111 1111 1111 1111111 11 1''' 111' 11tll11· 111t/1 1/11

f. ALLRED.--·-- ·'·: :.··:· ;j ; . 2101 FM 369 N. . :~·~· ·.

Iowa Park, Tx. 76j67

.f·.

~---------""-~:~=-.......-!.,_

. . ,____-~"'~~=·;. -.:~:. ~---~~~. . --=· ~7,:~~;~----. -.~-~_;~~~ ----.

CLER~,

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS of TEXAS, ABEL ACOSTA P.O. Box 12308, CAPITOL STATIC AUSTIN, TX. 78711

'\,

·",,.